“Just getting nasty with Hillary won’t work,” Mr. Trump said. “You really have to get people to look hard at her character, and to get women to ask themselves if Hillary is truly sincere and authentic. Because she has been really ugly in trying to destroy Bill’s mistresses, and she is pandering to women so obviously when she is only interested in getting power.” –Times
Donald Trump has openly outlined his campaign, which is going to revolve around:
- Bill’s infidelities (and Hillary’s role)
- All the crackpot conspiracies from the 90s (including cattle futures and probably Vince Foster)
- Ties to Wall Street corruption.
The thing here is that while the first three are nonsense, they all tie in together to portray someone as essentially being sleazy. For Trump to focus on money-and-power grubbing or sexual pecadillos is obviously insane, but it might work. He’ll still lose, I think, as demographics make it very difficult, but the media loves stories about Hillary being crooked and the Clintons as being low and grubby farm people. Maureen Dowd is going to have no less than 11 columns between now and November that are transcripts of phone interviews with Trump (and another 5 which are saucily imagined conversations between Hillary and Bill. Every single one of these columns will mention Lena Dunham). It’s going to be as ugly as you imagine.
On the other hand, I’m not yet emotionally ready to talk about this labor/environmentalist article. I hope Loomis has something about it.
Hillary is way better than Mr. Trump.
Agreed. I mean, most things are better than Trump, but Hillary especially. Caricature aside, she’s a laser-smart and dedicated public servant. The hatred for her is really bizarre, and says a lot.
Pingback: Labor and The Environment: Ask And Ye Shall Receive | Shooting Irrelevance